On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:55:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 06:25:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Commit 6680ec68eff47d36f67b4351bc9836fd6cba9532
> > (tuntap: hardware vlan tx support) breaks the truncated packet signal by 
> > never
> > return a length greater than iov length in tun_put_user(). This patch fixes 
> > this
> > by always return the length of packet plus possible vlan header. Caller can
> > detect the truncated packet by comparing the return value and the size of 
> > iov
> > length.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Zhi Yong Wu <wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> 
> So writer gets back a value greater than what was written?

Pls ignore this question - wrote it before I understood the
patch, and forgot to remove.
The rest of the comments and the proposed alternative patch
still stand.

> > ---
> > The patch is needed for stable.
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/tun.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index e26cbea..dd1bd7a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -1183,7 +1183,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
> >                         const struct iovec *iv, int len)
> >  {
> >     struct tun_pi pi = { 0, skb->protocol };
> > -   ssize_t total = 0;
> > +   struct {
> > +           __be16 h_vlan_proto;
> > +           __be16 h_vlan_TCI;
> > +   } veth;
> > +   ssize_t total = 0, off = 0;
> 
> Why off = 0 here?
> We initialize it to total unconditionally, don't we?
> 
> >     int vlan_offset = 0;
> >  
> >     if (!(tun->flags & TUN_NO_PI)) {
> > @@ -1248,14 +1252,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
> >             total += tun->vnet_hdr_sz;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   off = total;
> >     if (!vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
> >             len = min_t(int, skb->len, len);
> >     } else {
> >             int copy, ret;
> > -           struct {
> > -                   __be16 h_vlan_proto;
> > -                   __be16 h_vlan_TCI;
> > -           } veth;
> >  
> >             veth.h_vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto;
> >             veth.h_vlan_TCI = htons(vlan_tx_tag_get(skb));
> > @@ -1264,22 +1265,22 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
> >             len = min_t(int, skb->len + VLAN_HLEN, len);
> >  
> >             copy = min_t(int, vlan_offset, len);
> > -           ret = skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec(skb, 0, iv, total, copy);
> > +           ret = skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec(skb, 0, iv, off, copy);
> >             len -= copy;
> > -           total += copy;
> > +           off += copy;
> >             if (ret || !len)
> >                     goto done;
> >  
> >             copy = min_t(int, sizeof(veth), len);
> > -           ret = memcpy_toiovecend(iv, (void *)&veth, total, copy);
> > +           ret = memcpy_toiovecend(iv, (void *)&veth, off, copy);
> >             len -= copy;
> > -           total += copy;
> > +           off += copy;
> >             if (ret || !len)
> >                     goto done;
> 
> This seems wrong: if one of the branches above is taken, total is
> never incremented.
> 
> >     }
> >  
> > -   skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec(skb, vlan_offset, iv, total, len);
> > -   total += len;
> > +   skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec(skb, vlan_offset, iv, off, len);
> > +   total += skb->len + (vlan_offset ? sizeof(veth) : 0);
> >  
> >  done:
> >     tun->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
> 
> I also think it's inelegant that the veth struct is now in the
> outside scope, and the extra ? is also ugly.
> 
> Here's a smaller patch to fix all these problems - what do you think?
> 
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 782e38b..3297e41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
>                           const struct iovec *iv, int len)
>  {
>       struct tun_pi pi = { 0, skb->protocol };
> -     ssize_t total = 0;
> +     ssize_t total = 0, offset;
>       int vlan_offset = 0;
>  
>       if (!(tun->flags & TUN_NO_PI)) {
> @@ -1248,6 +1248,8 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
>               total += tun->vnet_hdr_sz;
>       }
>  
> +     offset = total;
> +     total += skb->len;
>       if (!vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
>               len = min_t(int, skb->len, len);
>       } else {
> @@ -1257,6 +1259,8 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
>                       __be16 h_vlan_TCI;
>               } veth;
>  
> +             total += sizeof(veth);
> +
>               veth.h_vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto;
>               veth.h_vlan_TCI = htons(vlan_tx_tag_get(skb));
>  
> @@ -1279,7 +1283,6 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
>       }
>  
>       skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec(skb, vlan_offset, iv, total, len);
> -     total += len;
>  
>  done:
>       tun->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
> 
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to