On 12/09/2013 02:09 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index cfb4190..5372521 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1759,6 +1759,12 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct 
> *mm,
>               goto out_fail;
>       }
>  
> +     /* PTL provides a memory barrier with change_protection_range */
> +     ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
> +     if (tlb_flush_pending(mm))
> +             flush_tlb_range(vma, mmun_start, mmun_end);
> +     spin_unlock(ptl);
> +
>       /* Prepare a page as a migration target */
>       __set_page_locked(new_page);
>       SetPageSwapBacked(new_page);

I don't think there is a need for that extra memory barrier.

On the "set_tlb_flush_pending, turn ptes into NUMA ones" side, we
have a barrier in the form of the page table lock.

We only end up in this code path if the pte/pmd already is a NUMA
one, and we take several spinlocks along the way to doing this test.
That provides for the memory barrier in this code path.

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to