On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:21:48 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Also, I prefer if (!arg) over if (arg == NULL), but I'm not going to > > fight over that ;-) > > Yeah, it's about preference. I can do it your way from now on if you > want while as you can see it's more error-prone - but no, I didn't do it > intentionally because of that. ;-) I'm not really that picky. When I code, I use the (!arg) version. I haven't had an inverse bug due to it in a long time. But I've fixed others that have done it, so I understand the rational for it. What I refuse to accept is the "if (NULL == arg)" notation. That just makes it hard to read, and compilers are smart enough today to detect the "if (arg = NULL)" bugs. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
