On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:34:17PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:28:02PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
> >
> > The Linux kernel has traditionally required that an UNLOCK+LOCK pair
> > act as a full memory barrier when either (1) that UNLOCK+LOCK pair
> > was executed by the same CPU or task, or (2) the same lock variable
> > was used for the UNLOCK and LOCK. It now seems likely that very few
> > places in the kernel rely on this full-memory-barrier semantic, and
> > with the advent of queued locks, providing this semantic either requires
> > complex reasoning, or for some architectures, added overhead.
> >
> > This commit therefore adds a smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), which may be
> > placed after a LOCK primitive to restore the full-memory-barrier semantic.
> > All definitions are currently no-ops, but will be upgraded for some
> > architectures when queued locks arrive.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Linux-Arch <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
>
> It seems quite unfortunate that this isn't in some common location, and
> then only overridden by architectures that need to do so.
I was thinking that include/asm-generic/barrier.h was the place, but
it is all-or-nothing, used by UP architectures, from what I can see.
I figured that if there is such a common location, posting this patch
might flush it out. I am not sure that this single definition is worth
the creation of a common place -- or even this definition combined with
smp_read_barrier_depends().
> More importantly: you document this earlier in the patch series than you
> introduce it.
Fair point, I reversed the order of those two patches.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
