Around Mon 09 Dec 2013 18:49:13 -0800 or thereabout, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 
> Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate()
> as errors.  This is needed since subsequent patches will convert
> clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather
> than a signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates higher
> than (2^31)-1 Hz.
> 
> Eventually, when calling clk_round_rate(), only a return value of
> zero will be considered a error; all other values will be
> considered valid rates.  The comparison against values less than
> 0 is kept to preserve the correct behavior in the meantime.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalms...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtv...@samfundet.no>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <pe...@perex.cz>

Thanks for fixing.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtv...@samfundet.no>

> ---
> Applies on v3.13-rc3.  See also:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138542591313620&w=2
> 
>  sound/atmel/abdac.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/atmel/abdac.c b/sound/atmel/abdac.c
> index 721d8fd..3519518 100644
> --- a/sound/atmel/abdac.c
> +++ b/sound/atmel/abdac.c
> @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static int set_sample_rates(struct atmel_abdac *dac)
>       /* we start at 192 kHz and work our way down to 5112 Hz */
>       while (new_rate >= RATE_MIN && index < (MAX_NUM_RATES + 1)) {
>               new_rate = clk_round_rate(dac->sample_clk, 256 * new_rate);
> -             if (new_rate < 0)
> +             if (new_rate <= 0)
>                       break;
>               /* make sure we are below the ABDAC clock */
>               if (index < MAX_NUM_RATES &&
> 

-- 
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to