On 11/20/13 10:26, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/17/13 12:27, Max Filippov wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface now supports 64 bits. Upgrade >>> to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit >>> registration interface. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >>> >>> Patch is based on Linus' tip. Not event compile tested. >>> >>> arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> Build and run-tested, appears to work. >> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> >> >> Should it go through xtensa tree, or through some other tree as a part >> of a bigger conversion series? > If it can go through xtensa that sounds like the best option. Otherwise > we can send it through the tip/timers tree. >
Ping? I don't see this patch in linux-next yet so should I send this through the tip/timers tree? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
