On 12/10/2013 08:19 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:18:53PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c
>> +static void stfsm_wait_seq(struct stfsm *fsm)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long timeo = jiffies + HZ;
>> +
>> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeo)) {
>> + if (stfsm_is_idle(fsm))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + cond_resched();
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_err(fsm->dev, "timeout on sequence completion\n");
>
> I believe the timeout logic is incorrect. What if we wait a "long time"
> to call stfsm_wait_seq() (due to scheduling, or otherwise)? Then the
> while loop might not even run once (time_before(x, y) is false). Or what
> if cond_resched() waits for a long time...
>
> So you need an extra check of stfsm_is_idle() after the while loop,
> before you declare a timeout.
Yes, good catch, this needs to updated.
Cheers,
Angus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
