On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 03:03:00PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> wrote: > > > What is going on about that patch? > > Mark fixed the problem with the following commits:
Thanks for the info, Fabio. Shawn > > commit 75bc9641cadd2a3f91f9c2e7f2fdfdeb8bd4b1d6 > Author: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org> > Date: Wed Nov 27 16:22:53 2013 +0000 > > regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints > > Eliminate the gap between DT becoming available and this being used to say > we have full constraints by checking directly for DT every time we check > for full constraints. This improves interoperaton with optional regulator > support. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org> > Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > > commit 87b2841753e1694fc96fefb467f6aff9940b07af > Author: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org> > Date: Wed Nov 27 16:13:10 2013 +0000 > > regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function > > Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what > full constraints are more easily. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org> > > Regards, > > Fabio Estevam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
