On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like xadd() is x86-specific, but this is common code. One
> approach would be to do xadd() for other arches, another approach
> would be to make .rw be an atomic_t rather than a u32. Making it
> be atomic_t is probably easiest. (The cmpxchg()s would then need
> to be atomic_cmpxchg().)
Note that "xadd()" has different semantics from "atomic_add_return()".
xadd() returns the original value, while atomic_add_return() returns
the result of the addition.
In this case, we seem to want the xadd() semantics. I guess we can use
"atomic_add_return(val,&atomic)-val" and just assume that the compiler
gets it right (with the addition and the subtraction cancelling out).
Or maybe we should have a "atomic_add_return_original()" with xadd
semantics?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
