There are several drivers making use of ACPI _DSM method to detect
and invoke device specific methods. Currently every driver has
implemented its private version to support ACPI _DSM method.
So this patch introduces three helper functions to support ACPI _DSM
method, which will be used to replace open-coded versions.

It helps to simplify code and improve code readability.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/utils.c    |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |   26 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index 6d408bf..9517b0a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -574,3 +574,101 @@ acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int 
lock)
 
        return status;
 }
+
+/**
+ * acpi_evaluate_dsm: evaluate device's _DSM method
+ * @handle: ACPI device handle
+ * @uuid: UUID of requested functions, should be 16 bytes
+ * @rev: revision number of requested function
+ * @func: requested function number
+ * @argv4: the function specific parameter
+ *
+ * Evaluate device's _DSM method with specified UUID, revision id and
+ * function number. Caller needs to free the returned object.
+ *
+ * Though ACPI defines the fourth parameter for _DSM should be a package,
+ * some old BIOSes do expect a buffer or an integer etc.
+ */
+union acpi_object *
+acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, int func,
+                 union acpi_object *argv4)
+{
+       acpi_status ret;
+       struct acpi_buffer buf = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
+       union acpi_object params[4];
+       struct acpi_object_list input = {
+               .count = 4,
+               .pointer = params,
+       };
+
+       params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+       params[0].buffer.length = 16;
+       params[0].buffer.pointer = (char *)uuid;
+       params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+       params[1].integer.value = rev;
+       params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+       params[2].integer.value = func;
+       if (argv4) {
+               params[3] = *argv4;
+       } else {
+               params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
+               params[3].package.count = 0;
+               params[3].package.elements = NULL;
+       }
+
+       ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &buf);
+       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(ret))
+               return (union acpi_object *)buf.pointer;
+
+       if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND)
+               acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+                               "failed to evaluate _DSM method (0x%x)\n", ret);
+
+       return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_dsm);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_check_dsm: check whether _DSM method under @handle supports
+ *                requested functions.
+ * @handle: ACPI device handle
+ * @uuid: UUID of requested functions, should be 16 bytes at least
+ * @rev: revision number of requested functions
+ * @funcs: bitmap of requested functions
+ * @exclude: excluding special value, used to support i915 and nouveau
+ *
+ * Evaluate device's _DSM method to check whether it supports requested
+ * functions. Currently only support 64 functions at maximum, should be
+ * enough for now.
+ */
+bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, u64 funcs)
+{
+       int i;
+       u64 mask = 0;
+       union acpi_object *obj;
+
+       if (funcs == 0)
+               return false;
+
+       obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, uuid, rev, 0, NULL);
+       if (!obj)
+               return false;
+
+       /* For compatibility, old BIOSes may return an integer */
+       if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
+               mask = obj->integer.value;
+       else if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
+               for (i = 0; i < obj->buffer.length && i < 8; i++)
+                       mask |= (((u8)obj->buffer.pointer[i]) << (i * 8));
+       ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+       /*
+        * Bit 0 indicates whether there's support for any functions other than
+        * function 0 for the specified UUID and revision.
+        */
+       if ((mask & 0x1) && (mask & funcs) == funcs)
+               return true;
+
+       return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_check_dsm);
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index c602c77..efccf39 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -66,6 +66,32 @@ bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
 bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
 bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);
 
+bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, u64 funcs);
+union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid,
+                       int rev, int func, union acpi_object *argv4);
+
+static inline union acpi_object *
+acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, int rev, int func,
+                       union acpi_object *argv4, acpi_object_type type)
+{
+       union acpi_object *obj;
+
+       obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, uuid, rev, func, argv4);
+       if (obj && obj->type != type) {
+               ACPI_FREE(obj);
+               obj = NULL;
+       }
+
+       return obj;
+}
+
+#define        ACPI_INIT_DSM_ARGV4(cnt, eles)                  \
+       {                                               \
+         .type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE,                    \
+         .package.count = (cnt),                       \
+         .package.elements = (eles)                    \
+       }
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to