Hi Jonas,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> Thanks for the replies!
>
> This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
> on the fixed rate clock:
>
> Moving fixed-clock "ref12" from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
> for other clocks, this is why ref12 is still in SoC.
>
> My assertion is that "fixed-clock" clocks are probed later when
> placed in .dts (see diff and boot log below).
> of_clk_get() from clk_pll in .dtsi fails, i.e. fixed-clock ref12
> is not added as a provider in time before clk_pll loads.
I haven't looked into the details, but is of_clk_get_parent_name() an
alternative? That function does purely rely on DT data to obtain a name
of a clock which may enable to register your PLL? Then probing oder
wouldn't matter anymore.
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
