Hello, Rafael. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:31:37AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > If this looks good to you, I'll commit it to wq/for-3.14 and we can at > > least start to clean up things. > > Yes, it does. > > So with that I need to do workqueue_set_max_active(wq, WQ_FROZEN_ACTIVE) > during > suspend and then workqueue_set_max_active(wq, WQ_DFL_ACTIVE) during resume on > my workqueue, right?
Yeah, you can also do workqueue_set_max_active(wq, 0) during resume to restore the default value, which is what's used by alloc_workqueue() anyway. I'll apply the two patches to wq/for-3.14 once David reviews them or if you wanna take them through the pm tree, that's fine too. I don't have anything scheduled for wq for the next merge window. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
