On 13/12/20, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:48:26PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On 13/12/17, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:03:38PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > > task->pid is only ever assigned once (well ok, twice). For system > > > > health and > > > > secure logging confidence, make it const to make it much more > > > > intentional when > > > > it is being changed. > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Peter, as you had suggested, does this approach work for you in terms > > > > of making > > > > task_struct::pid a lot more difficult to accidentally change to try to > > > > preserve > > > > its integrity? > > > > > > Yeah, looks good to me. > > > > Ok, who would carry this patch? You? AKPM? Me? > > Andrew seems to be the him who carries PID stuff. I don't think I can make > a case that its scheduler related. > > > Any opinions about Oleg's macro idea? > > I'm undecided.. on the one hand the macro makes it too easy to change > const stuff, on the other hand it makes it explicit and easily > greppable.
My first reaction was it makes it too easy. Easy, but much more clear in its intentions. greppable hadn't occured to me. I figure the accompanying comment covers intent. - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rbri...@redhat.com> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/