On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:08 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, john stultz wrote: > > Yep, performance is a big concern. Re-working ntp_scale() is still on my > > TODO list. I just didn't get to it in this release. > > This is a hopeless endeavor if you look at the function. > Throw ntp_scale out and calculate a scaling factor during the ticks. At > tick time then you may forward the clock a few ns in order to correct it > otherwise monkey around with the scaling factor.
We talked about this last time. I do intend to re-work ntp_scale() so its not a function call, much as you describe above. hopelessly endeavoring, -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
