Andrew Morton wrote:

> So...  Will someone be sending a new patch?

Here's a cheesy patch that simply marks the ioctx as dead before
destroying it.  Though I'd like to simply mark the ioctx as dead until
it actually gets used, I don't know enough about the code to make that
sort of invasive change.

--D

-----------------
Signed-off-by: Darrick Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- linux-2.6.10/fs/aio.c.old   2005-01-24 16:12:46.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.10/fs/aio.c       2005-01-24 16:30:53.000000000 -0800
@@ -1285,6 +1285,10 @@
                if (!ret)
                        return 0;
 
+               spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
+               ctx->dead = 1;
+               spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
+
                io_destroy(ioctx);
        }

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to