Andrew Morton wrote: > So... Will someone be sending a new patch?
Here's a cheesy patch that simply marks the ioctx as dead before destroying it. Though I'd like to simply mark the ioctx as dead until it actually gets used, I don't know enough about the code to make that sort of invasive change. --D ----------------- Signed-off-by: Darrick Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.10/fs/aio.c.old 2005-01-24 16:12:46.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.10/fs/aio.c 2005-01-24 16:30:53.000000000 -0800 @@ -1285,6 +1285,10 @@ if (!ret) return 0; + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock); + ctx->dead = 1; + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock); + io_destroy(ioctx); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/