于 2013/12/24 20:38, Joe Perches 写道:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 19:27 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned
>> to instead of memcmp.
> 
> Hi again Ding.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> []
>> @@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ pcnet32_probe1(unsigned long ioaddr, int shared, 
>> struct pci_dev *pdev)
> []
>> -    if (memcmp(promaddr, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN) ||
>> +    if (!ether_addr_equal(promaddr, dev->dev_addr) ||
> 
> Can you please make sure the commit message matches the
> code changes?
> 
> This uses ether_addr_equal not ether_addr_equal_unaligned.
> 
> Thanks for the work.
> 

Oh, no,  maybe I was dizzy by these patches,  I should be more careful,
sorry about that, I will resend this one.

Regards
Ding

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to