于 2013/12/24 20:38, Joe Perches 写道: > On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 19:27 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned >> to instead of memcmp. > > Hi again Ding. > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c > [] >> @@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ pcnet32_probe1(unsigned long ioaddr, int shared, >> struct pci_dev *pdev) > [] >> - if (memcmp(promaddr, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN) || >> + if (!ether_addr_equal(promaddr, dev->dev_addr) || > > Can you please make sure the commit message matches the > code changes? > > This uses ether_addr_equal not ether_addr_equal_unaligned. > > Thanks for the work. >
Oh, no, maybe I was dizzy by these patches, I should be more careful, sorry about that, I will resend this one. Regards Ding > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/