Hello.
On 25-12-2013 7:29, Ding Tianhong wrote:
Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
instead of memcmp.
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>
---
drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_net.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_net.c b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_net.c
index f91c80c..3dfc33b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_net.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_net.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static __be16 dvb_net_eth_type_trans(struct sk_buff *skb,
eth = eth_hdr(skb);
if (*eth->h_dest & 1) {
- if(memcmp(eth->h_dest,dev->broadcast, ETH_ALEN)==0)
+ if(ether_addr_equal(eth->h_dest,dev->broadcast))
There should be space after comma.
@@ -674,11 +674,11 @@ static void dvb_net_ule( struct net_device *dev, const u8
*buf, size_t buf_len )
if (priv->rx_mode != RX_MODE_PROMISC) {
if (priv->ule_skb->data[0] &
0x01) {
/* multicast or
broadcast */
- if
(memcmp(priv->ule_skb->data, bc_addr, ETH_ALEN)) {
+ if
(!ether_addr_equal(priv->ule_skb->data, bc_addr)) {
/* multicast */
if
(priv->rx_mode == RX_MODE_MULTI) {
int i;
- for(i = 0; i <
priv->multi_num && memcmp(priv->ule_skb->data, priv->multi_macs[i], ETH_ALEN); i++)
+ for(i = 0; i <
priv->multi_num && !ether_addr_equal(priv->ule_skb->data, priv->multi_macs[i]);
i++)
Shouldn't this line be broken?
;
if (i ==
priv->multi_num)
drop = 1;
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
