Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
to instead of memcmp.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianh...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
index c765718..ced5b13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static inline void sgiseeq_rx(struct net_device *dev, 
struct sgiseeq_private *sp
                if (pkt_status & SEEQ_RSTAT_FIG) {
                        /* Packet is OK. */
                        /* We don't want to receive our own packets */
-                       if (memcmp(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN)) 
{
+                       if (!ether_addr_equal(rd->skb->data + 6, 
dev->dev_addr)) {
                                if (len > rx_copybreak) {
                                        skb = rd->skb;
                                        newskb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, 
PKT_BUF_SZ);
-- 
1.8.0


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to