On 30 December 2013 03:47, Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Tushar Behera (2013-12-26 02:18:58)
>> The clocks in S2MPS11 and S5M8767 are managed in the same way, baring
>> a difference in the register offset. It would be better to update
>> existing S2MPS11 driver to support the clocks in S5M8767, rather than
>> creating an almost duplicate driver altogether.
>
> Can you rebase patches #1 & #2 onto clk-next? They do not apply cleanly
> as-is.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>

Commit 1b1ccee1e821 "mfd: s2mps11: Fix build after regmap field rename
in sec-core.c" is also touching this file, which is in Mark's tree
right now. If I rebase
this patch on top clk-next, I am getting conflicts when I merge that
with linux-next.
Let me know how you want to handle this.

I am attaching the rebased patches for your reference.
If you want, I will send them again through git-send-email.

-- 
Tushar Behera
From f4f730d4bea3848d21e487aa08ff019c588e6ecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.beh...@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:55:44 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] clk: clk-s2mps11: Refactor for including support for
 other MFD clocks

The clocks in S2MPS11 and S5M8767 are managed in the same way, baring
a difference in the register offset. It would be better to update
existing S2MPS11 driver to support the clocks in S5M8767, rather than
to create an almost duplicate driver altogether.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.beh...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.f...@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c b/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c
index 7be41e6..494d1df 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct s2mps11_clk {
 	struct clk_lookup *lookup;
 	u32 mask;
 	bool enabled;
+	unsigned int reg;
 };
 
 static struct s2mps11_clk *to_s2mps11_clk(struct clk_hw *hw)
@@ -61,7 +62,7 @@ static int s2mps11_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = regmap_update_bits(s2mps11->iodev->regmap,
-				S2MPS11_REG_RTC_CTRL,
+				 s2mps11->reg,
 				 s2mps11->mask, s2mps11->mask);
 	if (!ret)
 		s2mps11->enabled = true;
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ static void s2mps11_clk_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
 	struct s2mps11_clk *s2mps11 = to_s2mps11_clk(hw);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = regmap_update_bits(s2mps11->iodev->regmap, S2MPS11_REG_RTC_CTRL,
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(s2mps11->iodev->regmap, s2mps11->reg,
 			   s2mps11->mask, ~s2mps11->mask);
 
 	if (!ret)
@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ static int s2mps11_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct sec_pmic_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 	struct s2mps11_clk *s2mps11_clks, *s2mps11_clk;
 	struct device_node *clk_np = NULL;
+	unsigned int s2mps11_reg;
 	int i, ret = 0;
 	u32 val;
 
@@ -169,13 +171,23 @@ static int s2mps11_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(clk_np))
 		return PTR_ERR(clk_np);
 
+	switch(platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data) {
+	case S2MPS11X:
+		s2mps11_reg = S2MPS11_REG_RTC_CTRL;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid device type\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	};
+
 	for (i = 0; i < S2MPS11_CLKS_NUM; i++, s2mps11_clk++) {
 		s2mps11_clk->iodev = iodev;
 		s2mps11_clk->hw.init = &s2mps11_clks_init[i];
 		s2mps11_clk->mask = 1 << i;
+		s2mps11_clk->reg = s2mps11_reg;
 
 		ret = regmap_read(s2mps11_clk->iodev->regmap,
-				  S2MPS11_REG_RTC_CTRL, &val);
+				  s2mps11_clk->reg, &val);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto err_reg;
 
@@ -241,7 +253,7 @@ static int s2mps11_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct platform_device_id s2mps11_clk_id[] = {
-	{ "s2mps11-clk", 0},
+	{ "s2mps11-clk", S2MPS11X},
 	{ },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, s2mps11_clk_id);
-- 
1.7.9.5

From 5f3843da7bc71d126c0cce7a8e88aab1850c4b9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.beh...@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:56:27 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] clk: clk-s2mps11: Add support for clocks in S5M8767 MFD

Since clock operation within S2MPS11 and S5M8767 are similar, we can
support both the devices within a single driver.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.beh...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.f...@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/Kconfig       |    6 ++++--
 drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c |    5 +++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
index 407cffb..99332da 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
@@ -65,10 +65,12 @@ config COMMON_CLK_SI570
 	  clock generators.
 
 config COMMON_CLK_S2MPS11
-	tristate "Clock driver for S2MPS11 MFD"
+	tristate "Clock driver for S2MPS11/S5M8767 MFD"
 	depends on MFD_SEC_CORE
 	---help---
-	  This driver supports S2MPS11 crystal oscillator clock.
+	  This driver supports S2MPS11/S5M8767 crystal oscillator clock. These
+	  multi-function devices have 3 fixed-rate oscillators, clocked at
+	  32KHz each.
 
 config CLK_TWL6040
 	tristate "External McPDM functional clock from twl6040"
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c b/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c
index 494d1df..37e7285 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-s2mps11.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps11.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/samsung/s5m8767.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/samsung/core.h>
 
 #define s2mps11_name(a) (a->hw.init->name)
@@ -175,6 +176,9 @@ static int s2mps11_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	case S2MPS11X:
 		s2mps11_reg = S2MPS11_REG_RTC_CTRL;
 		break;
+	case S5M8767X:
+		s2mps11_reg = S5M8767_REG_CTRL1;
+		break;
 	default:
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid device type\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -254,6 +258,7 @@ static int s2mps11_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct platform_device_id s2mps11_clk_id[] = {
 	{ "s2mps11-clk", S2MPS11X},
+	{ "s5m8767-clk", S5M8767X},
 	{ },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, s2mps11_clk_id);
-- 
1.7.9.5

Reply via email to