On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:14 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Are you happy with "iocs", "attrib" and "datacs" for the names? > > Of the platforms with an smc91x platform_device (according to grep) only > 2 (lubbock, neponset) out of the 18 have memory resources other than the > iocs (full list of platforms is at the end, after the patch) > > So for the sake of the least intrusive patch I think for the main iocs > I'll call _byname and fallback on mem resource number 0 if no named iocs > resource exists. attrib and datacs must be explicitly named. This allows > most of the board ports to remain unchanged.
Sensible. > I also noticed that the name propagates into /proc/iomem etc > # cat /proc/iomem > [...] > 10000000-10000003 : datacs > 10000000-10000003 : smc91x > so perhaps smc91x-datacs -attrib -iocs might be more appropriate names? Probably, although "iocs" is rather criptic for someone not familiar with the chip. What about "smc91x-regs", "smc91x-attrib" and "smc91x-data32" ? Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
