On 01/04/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:20:14 -0800 Dave Hansen <d...@sr71.net> wrote: >> From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> >> There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except >> that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every >> other syscall. It is absurd to have the option in the >> arch-specific menus. > > You seem to have (mostly) lost the dependency some of the architecture > versions of config SECCOMP had on PROC_FS ...
I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away. I can't find any reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code. Is there some /proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed /proc/<pid>/seccomp interface? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
