On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 06:22:17PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > I'm not sure if the idea to create a dedicated sched_domain level for every > topology flag representing a specific functionality will scale. From the > perspective of energy-aware scheduling we need e.g. energy costs (P and C > state) which can only be populated towards the scheduler via an additional > sub-struct and additional function arch_sd_energy() like depicted in > Morten's email: > > [2] lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/14/102
That lkml.org link is actually not working for me (blank page -- maybe lkml.org is on the blink again). That said, I yet have to sit down and think about the P state stuff, but I was thinking we need some rudimentary domain support for that. For instance, the big-little thingies seem share their P state per cluster, so we need a domain at that level to hang some state off of -- which we actually have in this case. But we need to ensure we do have it -- somehow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/