3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

commit 1874119664dafda3ef2ed9b51b4759a9540d4a1a upstream.

We've tried to fix the error paths in this function before, but there
is still a hidden goto in the ceph_decode_need() macro which goes to the
wrong place.  We need to release the "req" and unlock a mutex before
returning.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <s...@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/ceph/osd_client.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -1488,14 +1488,14 @@ static void handle_reply(struct ceph_osd
        dout("handle_reply %p tid %llu req %p result %d\n", msg, tid,
             req, result);
 
-       ceph_decode_need(&p, end, 4, bad);
+       ceph_decode_need(&p, end, 4, bad_put);
        numops = ceph_decode_32(&p);
        if (numops > CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP)
                goto bad_put;
        if (numops != req->r_num_ops)
                goto bad_put;
        payload_len = 0;
-       ceph_decode_need(&p, end, numops * sizeof(struct ceph_osd_op), bad);
+       ceph_decode_need(&p, end, numops * sizeof(struct ceph_osd_op), bad_put);
        for (i = 0; i < numops; i++) {
                struct ceph_osd_op *op = p;
                int len;
@@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@ static void handle_reply(struct ceph_osd
                goto bad_put;
        }
 
-       ceph_decode_need(&p, end, 4 + numops * 4, bad);
+       ceph_decode_need(&p, end, 4 + numops * 4, bad_put);
        retry_attempt = ceph_decode_32(&p);
        for (i = 0; i < numops; i++)
                req->r_reply_op_result[i] = ceph_decode_32(&p);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to