On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The zeroing of a page of a arbitrary order in page_alloc.c and in hugetlb.c > > may benefit from a > > clear_page that is capable of zeroing multiple pages at once (and scrubd > > too but that is now an independent patch). The following patch extends > > clear_page with a second parameter specifying the order of the page to be > > zeroed to allow an > > efficient zeroing of pages. Hope I caught everything.... > > > > Sorry, I take it back. As Paul says: > > : Wouldn't it be nicer to call the version that takes the order > : parameter "clear_pages" and then define clear_page(p) as > : clear_pages(p, 0) ?
> It would make the patch considerably smaller, and our naming is all over > the place anyway... Sounds good. Note though that this just means renaming clear_page to clear_pages for all arches which would increase the patch size for the arch specific section. > I'd have thought that we'd want to make the new clear_pages() handle > highmem pages too, if only from a regularity POV. x86 hugetlbpages could > use it then, if someone thinks up a fast page-clearer. That would get us back to code duplication. We would have a clear_page (no highmem support) and a clear_pages (supporting highmem). Then it may also be better to pass the page struct to clear_pages instead of a memory address. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/