On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidl...@hp.com> wrote: > { > int lock_taken, ret, force_take = 0; > - u32 uval, newval, curval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(task); > + u32 uval, newval, uninitialized_var(curval), vpid = > task_pid_vnr(task);
Do you have some broken compiler? I really tend to hate this kind of workarounds, because as mentioned, they can actually hide valid warnings, and it seems to be due to just stupid compilers. Are we perhaps better off trying to get people off the broken compiler versions instead? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/