On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Mika Westerberg
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Instead of asking each driver to register to ACPI events we can just call
> acpi_gpiochip_register_interrupts() for each chip that has an ACPI handle.
> The function checks chip->to_irq and if it is set to NULL (a GPIO driver
> that doesn't do interrupts) the function does nothing.
>
> We also add the a new header drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h that is used for
> functions internal to gpiolib and add ACPI GPIO chip registering functions
> to that header.
>
> Once that is done we can remove call to acpi_gpiochip_register_interrupts()
> from its only user, pinctrl-baytrail.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Two questions:

- Can you please rebase patches 3-6 on my GPIO tree "devel" branch?

- Can this patch be placed first? It does not seem to depend on the
  others, to to push dependent patches to the end of the series.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to