On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:29:05 -0600
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:


> Just so you know what encompasses my 'normal testing', below is what I
> normally run through - if everything checks out, I'm satisfied things
> are basically good, though of course it didn't catch your traceoff bug
> so it's not complete.
> 
> As soon as I get the chance, I'll automate it and add more tests for
> completeness - as it is it's grown into something that already takes too
> long to do manually, so I need to find the time....
> 
> ---- basic high-level check
>      - quick enable/disable_event, capture limited number of events
>      - both counted and not
>      - verify flags
>      - verify removal
> 

Thanks, I may look at these in the future to update my tests. I've
attached some trigger tests that I just wrote up.

ftrace-event-traceon-off : tests the traceon and traceoff triggers.
  - enables tracing, sets traceoff trigger, checks if it disables
  - disables tracing, sets traceon trigger, checks if it enables
  - does a countdown from 3 to make sure the tracing is disabled
     3 times.

ftrace-event-stacktrace  : tests the event stack trace. It
  - checks enabling of events (non trigger)
  - checks enabling only the stack trace
  - checks enabling both the stack trace and events
  - checks if the count works from 1 2 or 3 times

ftrace-event-trigger-event : tests enable/disable_event trigger
  - checks if the event enables another event (several times)
  - checks if the event disables another event (several times)
  - checks if it enables an event count times "1 2 3"
  - then it tests the filter part of the event trigger (enable only)

Feel free to add onto these.

-- Steve

Attachment: ftrace-test-event-stacktrace
Description: Binary data

Attachment: ftrace-test-event-traceon-off
Description: Binary data

Attachment: ftrace-test-event-trigger-event
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to