In other words, I really do not know what format you prefer for design review.
Apparently, not as previously requested, so please tell me what format one _should_ submit design reviews in. I personally still think that submitting "pseudo-code" is a good way of it if it is clearly marked so like in my case, so that it does not mislead anyone that I accidentally submit a clearly broken change for an integration candidate. I hope it is understood that I am asking about design reviews before the lengthy implementation to potentially avoid a lot of additional work on both sides with writing and reviewing an implementation with a "wrong" approach... Cheers ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
