Hi Vince,

On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:30:17 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> just checking on the status of this patch.  Am I sending it to the wrong 
> place?  Did it get lost in the post-holiday e-mail purges?  
>
> The bug is annoying if you're trying to use perf on ARM systems.

Right, acme, would you please merge this?

Thanks,
Namhyung

>
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
>> 
>> "perf list" listing of hardware events doesn't work on older ARM devices.
>> The change enabling event detection:
>> 
>>  commit b41f1cec91c37eeea6fdb15effbfa24ea0a5536b
>>  Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung....@lge.com>
>>  Date:   Tue Aug 27 11:41:53 2013 +0900
>> 
>>      perf list: Skip unsupported events
>> 
>> 
>> uses the following code in tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:
>> 
>>         struct perf_event_attr attr = {
>>                 .type = type,
>>                 .config = config,
>>                 .disabled = 1,
>>                 .exclude_kernel = 1,
>>         };
>> 
>> On ARM machines pre-dating the Cortex-A15 this doesn't work, as
>> these machines don't support .exclude_kernel.  So starting with 3.12
>> "perf list" does not report any hardware events at all on older
>> machines (seen on Rasp-Pi, Pandaboard, Beagleboard, etc).
>> 
>> This version of the patch makes changes suggested by Namhyung Kim
>> to check for EACCESS and retry (instead of just dropping
>> the exclude_kernel) so we can properly handle machines where 
>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid is set to 2.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Chad Paradis <chad.para...@umit.maine.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.wea...@maine.edu>
>> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
>> 
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>> index 6de6f89..1fa98b9 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>> @@ -1082,12 +1082,12 @@ int is_valid_tracepoint(const char *event_string)
>>  static bool is_event_supported(u8 type, unsigned config)
>>  {
>>      bool ret = true;
>> +    int open_return;
>>      struct perf_evsel *evsel;
>>      struct perf_event_attr attr = {
>>              .type = type,
>>              .config = config,
>>              .disabled = 1,
>> -            .exclude_kernel = 1,
>>      };
>>      struct {
>>              struct thread_map map;
>> @@ -1099,7 +1099,20 @@ static bool is_event_supported(u8 type, unsigned 
>> config)
>>  
>>      evsel = perf_evsel__new(&attr);
>>      if (evsel) {
>> -            ret = perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, &tmap.map) >= 0;
>> +            open_return = perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, &tmap.map);
>> +            ret = open_return >= 0;
>> +
>> +            if (open_return == -EACCES) {
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * This happens if the paranoid value
>> +                     * /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid is set to 2
>> +                     * Re-run with exclude_kernel set; we don't do that
>> +                     * by default as some ARM machines do not support it.
>> +                     *
>> +                     */
>> +                    evsel->attr.exclude_kernel = 1;
>> +                    ret = perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, &tmap.map) >= 0;
>> +            }
>>              perf_evsel__delete(evsel);
>>      }
>>  
>> 
>
> Vince Weaver
> vincent.wea...@maine.edu
> http://www.eece.maine.edu/~vweaver/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to