On 09.01.2014, at 15:27, Charles Keepax <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:36:53PM +0100, Daniel Matuschek wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Matuschek <[email protected]>
>> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>                      pll_div->freqmode = post_table[i].freqmode;
>> -                    pll_div->mclkdiv = post_table[i].mclkdiv;
>> -                    target *= post_table[i].div;
>> -                    break;
>> +                    if ((mclk_div == WM8804_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE) ||
>> +                        ((post_table[i].mclkdiv == 1) &&
>> +                            (mclk_div == WM8804_MCLKDIV_1)) ||
>> +                        ((post_table[i].mclkdiv == 0) &&
>> +                            (mclk_div == WM8804_MCLKDIV_0))) {
> 
> Would probably be nicer to update the post_table to use the new
> defines and directly compare.

Yes, this is an option.

> 
>> +                            pll_div->mclkdiv = post_table[i].mclkdiv;
>> +                            target *= post_table[i].div;
>> +                            break;
>> +                    }
>>              }
>>      }
>> 
>> @@ -388,7 +396,7 @@ static int wm8804_set_pll(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int 
>> pll_id,
>>              int ret;
>>              struct pll_div pll_div;
>> 
>> -            ret = pll_factors(&pll_div, freq_out, freq_in);
>> +            ret = pll_factors(&pll_div, freq_out, freq_in, pll_id);
> 
> This does feel like a slight abuse of pll_id, it feels to me that
> using the set_clkdiv callback would be a little more natural from
> a user perspective.

Good idea, I will move it to set_clkdiv.

> 
>>              if (ret)
>>                      return ret;
>> 
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h
>> index 8ec14f5..0365177 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8804.h
>> @@ -58,4 +58,11 @@
>> 
>> #define WM8804_CLKOUT_DIV                    1
>> 
>> +#define WM8804_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE                     0
>> +#define WM8804_MCLKDIV_0                    1
>> +#define WM8804_MCLKDIV_1                    2
>> +#define WM8804_PLL_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE         WM8804_MCLKDIV_DONTCARE
>> +#define WM8804_PLL_MCLKDIV_0                        WM8804_MCLKDIV_0
>> +#define WM8804_PLL_MCLKDIV_1                        WM8804_MCLKDIV_1
> 
> Do we really need two copies of these?

Not really ;-) I will remove the duplicates.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to