On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:03:23 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 01:39:08PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:55:07 +0800 > > Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > What if use do want a qdisc and want to change the its queue length for > > > tun/macvlan? And the the name tx_queue_length is misleading. For tun it > > > may make sense since it was used in transmission path. For macvtap it > > > was not. So maybe what we need is just a new ioctl for both tun/macvtap > > > and a new feature flag. If user create the device with new feature flag, > > > the socket receive queue length could be changed by ioctl instead of > > > dev->tx_queue_length. If not, the old behaviour could be kept. > > > > The overloading of tx_queue_len in macvtap was the original design mistake. > > Can't this just be undone and expose rx_queue_len as sysfs attribute? > > Yes but we need to avoid breaking user-visible ABI. I think in this case, it was a mistake and hasn't been around long enough to cause serious damage. > So I think we'll need to catch any access attempts and redirect them to > the new rx_queue_len. I posted a patch like this using new > ndo_set_tx_queue_len/ndo_get_tx_queue_len. Have you seen it? What do > you think? It encourages others to do/make the same mistake so I don't like it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/