On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:34:31AM -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:14:36PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Myths are not really involved here. The IBM PC hardware specifications > > are fairly well defined and the various bits of "we glued a 2Mhz part > > onto the bus" stuff is all well documented. Nowdays its more complex > > because most kbc's aren't standalone low end microcontrollers but are > > chipset integrated cells or even software SMM emulations. > > > > The real test is to fish out something like an old Digital Hi-note > > laptop or an early 486 board with seperate kbc and try it. > > I have a Digital HiNote collecting dust which had this keyboard problem > with the RH 6.x 2.2.x boot disk kernels, IIRC. I can test if you like, > but I won't be able to get to it until the weekend. That'd be very nice indeed.
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
