On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Pawel Moll <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 17:26 +0000, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Good point. But what about also adding device tree support for >> naming the chips while you're at it? >> >> I imagine a generic gpiochip property in >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > Well, this has been discussed almost to death already (as you may > remember ;-) in the thread: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg00072.html > > (only portions survived) > > Although I was in favour of the generic binding (as were you if I > remember correctly), the final non-conclusion was not to open the > "generic door". Fair enough with me, I went the defined-in-code way > here... OK I buy this. I am willing to apply this patch. Just a problem: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I can't apply this patch :-) Please consult your fellow upstream developers on how to get the mail out of the ARM offices in a form that I can apply... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
