* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:41:01PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > > Andi Kleen (2):
> > > perf stat: Fix --delay option in man page
> > > perf record: Add --initial-delay option
>
> > Hm, so we now have two options that do something similar, one named
> > --delay, the other --initial-delay? That looks rather inconsistent.
>
> > Furthermore, it looks silly to rename things --initial-delay just to
> > preserve a rarely used option, --no-delay. Instead the better option
> > would be to rename --no-delay to --no-buffering, and use --delay and
> > use it consistently within the tools.
>
> Ok, agreed, I'll do that, adding a patch that renames the old option,
> then reworking Andi's patches to use --delay consistently.
Ok, thanks - I'll pull the existing lineup meanwhile, it's not a
showstopper.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
