On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 09:24:06 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
> > > 
> > > Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides 
> > > valid _BIF data then we should possibly just fall back to that rather 
> > > than adding another quirk table.
> > 
> > The problem is to know that _BIX is broken.  If we could figure that out
> > upfront, we woulnd't need the quirk table in any case.
> 
> It's obvious that it is in this case - the package is the wrong size.

Then Tianyu should be able to come up with a better fix relatively easily. :-)

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to