On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:48:23PM +0000, Gaurav Jain wrote:
> On 1/13/14, 11:54 AM, "Don Zickus" <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:32:14PM -0800, Gaurav Jain wrote:
> >> Anon records usually do not have the 'execname' entry. However if they
> >>are on
> >> the heap, the execname shows up as '[heap]'. The fix considers any
> >>executable
> >> entries in the map that do not have a name or are on the heap as anon
> >>records
> >> and sets the name to '//anon'.
> >>
> >> This fixes JIT profiling for records on the heap.
> >
> >I guess I don't understand the need for this fix. It seems breaking out
> >//anon vs. [heap] would be useful. Your patch is saying otherwise. Can
> >give a description of the problem you are trying to solve?
>
> Thank you for looking at the patch.
>
> We generate a perf map file which includes certain JIT¹ed functions that
> show up as [heap] entries. As a result, I included the executable heap
> entries as anon pages so that it would be handled in
> util/map.c:map__new(). The alternative would be to handle heap entries in
> map__new() directly, however I wasn¹t sure if this would break something
> as it seems that heap and stack entries are expected to fail all
> map__find_* functions. Thus I considered executable heap entries as
> //anon, but perhaps there is a better way.
Thanks for the improved problem description. I see it led to a better
patch. :-) That is why it is generally a good idea to describe the
problem you are trying to solve to see if others have a better solution.
Cheers,
Don
>
> >Also style issue below..
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain <gj...@fb.com>
> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl>
> >> Cc: Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Arun Sharma <asha...@fb.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/util/event.c | 5 ++---
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.c b/tools/perf/util/event.c
> >> index bb788c1..ae9c55b 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/event.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.c
> >> @@ -224,10 +224,9 @@ static int
> >>perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events(struct perf_tool *tool,
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> event->header.misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (!strcmp(execname, ""))
> >> + } if (!strcmp(execname, "") || !strcmp(execname, "[heap]")) {
> >
> >The '} if' part should seperate the 'if' on to its own line (unless you
> >meant an 'else' in there).
>
> Bah yes, I intended 'else if'. I apologize for that. Does the fact that I
> filtered anon entries to only those marked as executable break the
> existing behavior?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gaurav
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
