On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 22:45 +0100, Timo Kamph wrote: > I guess you did somthing like this: > > 2.6.7 -patch-> 2.6.8 -patch-> 2.6.8.1 -patch-> 2.6.9 -patch-> 2.6.10. > > And you didn't noticed that the 2.6.9 patch failed, because it is diffed > against 2.6.8 and not 2.6.8.1!
You're perfectly right. I thought "patch" would stop and ask me something, but the error was silently buried under lots of "patching file" lines. > If you do the patching without the 2.6.8.1 patch everything should be fine. It is! Thanks a lot! Viktor.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part