On 01/10/2014 03:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

:-)

Something like this perhaps?

---
Subject: x86, mm: Allow double faults from interrupts

Waiman managed to trigger a PMI while in a emulate_vsyscall() fault, the
PMI in turn managed to trigger a fault while obtaining a stack trace.
This triggered the double fault logic and killed the process dead.

Fix this by explicitly excluding interrupts from the double fault logic.

Reported-by: Waiman Long<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<[email protected]>
---
  arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 9ff85bb8dd69..4c8e32986aad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -641,6 +641,20 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,

        /* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
        if (fixup_exception(regs)) {
+               /*
+                * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This
+                * makes the below double fault logic only apply to a
+                * task double faulting from task context.
+                */
+               if (in_interrupt())
+                       return;
+
+               /*
+                * Per the above we're !in_interrupt(), aka. task context.
+                *
+                * In this case we need to make sure we're not double faulting
+                * through the emulate_vsyscall() logic.
+                */
                if (current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error&&  signal) {
                        tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
                        tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | PF_USER;
@@ -649,6 +663,10 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
                        /* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */
                        force_sig_info_fault(signal, si_code, address, tsk, 0);
                }
+
+               /*
+                * Barring that, we can do the fixup and be happy.
+                */
                return;
        }


Are you going to send out an official patch to fix this problem? I really like to see it merged into 3.13 before it is released.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to