From: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>

The changelog for Rik's "sched/numa: Stay on the same node if CLONE_VM" patch
serves well documented in the code.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7f45fd5..a2d690c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1743,10 +1743,16 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, 
struct task_struct *p)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
        if (p->mm && atomic_read(&p->mm->mm_users) == 1) {
-               p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies + 
msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
                p->mm->numa_scan_seq = 0;
+               p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies +
+                       msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
        }
 
+       /*
+        * A newly spawned thread should stay on the same NUMA node as its
+        * parent. This prevents processes from being "torn" across multiple
+        * NUMA nodes every time they spawn a new thread.
+        */
        if (clone_flags & CLONE_VM)
                p->numa_preferred_nid = current->numa_preferred_nid;
        else
-- 
1.8.1.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to