On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > index d74c0b3..c4c5588 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct
> > device_driver *drv)
> > static int i2c_device_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env
> > *env)
> > {
> > struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = acpi_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env);
> > + if (rc != -ENODEV)
> > + return rc;
> >
> > if (add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=%s%s",
> > I2C_MODULE_PREFIX, client->name))
>
> I wonder why we don't have/need that with CONFIG_OF? Because probably
> nobody is using modules with i2c devices there?
>
This seems a gap to me but I'm not 100% sure.
I saw Grant Likely introduced the OF style MODALIAS to platform bus, and
OF style registration/binding to i2c bus, maybe he has an answer for
this.
thanks,
rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
