Hi Kyle, On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:48:17PM +0000, Kyle McMartin wrote: > I received a bug report about the ruby test-suite failing on AArch64 when > attempting to pass MAX_ARG_STRLEN sized args to execv[1]. It was > expecting an E2BIG returned, but instead was receiving ENOMEM, and > concatenating the argument strings in funky ways. > > The problem appeared to be in __strnlen_user on arm64, as when > instrumenting fs/exec.c to compare the results of the asm-generic > strnlen_user, I noticed an off-by-one on the result: > long-param-test: optimized strnlen_user (131072) and naive (131073) disagree! > > As a result, fix strnlen_user to match expected behaviour as documented > in lib/strnlen_user.c, and return count+1 when count would be exceeded. > > I didn't feel comfortable prodding the assembler, so I just worked > around it in the wrapper.
Actually, I have removed strnlen_user for 3.14. Could you try your test case with our for-next branch please? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core As for the issue you spotted, we probably need a fix for that to go into stable kernels. Does the following (smaller patch) work for you? Will --->8 diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/strnlen_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/strnlen_user.S index 7f7b176a5646..73f3335a2a45 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/strnlen_user.S +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/strnlen_user.S @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ ENTRY(__strnlen_user) USER(9f, ldrb w3, [x0], #1 ) cbnz w3, 1b 2: sub x0, x0, x2 + cinc x0, x0, mi ret ENDPROC(__strnlen_user) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/