On 01/16/2014 08:51 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Miller <mike.mil...@hp.com>
>
> This patch has every ID we have in our svn repository. Some controllers were
> cancelled, others added, now the cancelled ones are back. Apparently the
> debate rages on about which controllers are cancelled, which are not,
> whatever. Please accept this patch. It is dependent upon the patches I sent
> yesterday. 
> This patch made/tested against kernel-3.13.0-rc8
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mike.mil...@hp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/hpsa.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> index 348b207..3affec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id hpsa_pci_device_id[] = {
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF,     0x103C, 0x3354},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF,     0x103C, 0x3355},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF,     0x103C, 0x3356},
> +     {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1920},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1921},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1922},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1923},
> @@ -108,15 +109,19 @@ static const struct pci_device_id hpsa_pci_device_id[] 
> = {
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1926},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1928},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x1929},
> +     {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH,     0x103C, 0x192A},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21BD},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21BE},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21BF},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C0},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C2},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C3},
> +     {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C4},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C5},
> +     {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C6},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C7},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C8},
> +     {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21C9},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21CA},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21CB},
>       {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP,     PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI,     0x103C, 0x21CC},
> @@ -149,22 +154,29 @@ static struct board_type products[] = {
>       {0x3354103C, "Smart Array P420i", &SA5_access},
>       {0x3355103C, "Smart Array P220i", &SA5_access},
>       {0x3356103C, "Smart Array P721m", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x1920103C, "Smart Array P430i", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1921103C, "Smart Array P830i", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1922103C, "Smart Array P430", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1923103C, "Smart Array P431", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1924103C, "Smart Array P830", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x1925103C, "Smart Array P831", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1926103C, "Smart Array P731m", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1928103C, "Smart Array P230i", &SA5_access},
>       {0x1929103C, "Smart Array P530", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x192A103C, "Smart Array P531", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21BD103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21BE103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21BF103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21C0103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x21C1103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},

I think that both tables should be in sync - but there is no 0x21c1 in 
hpsa_pci_device_id
(and the 0x1925), could you clarify that?

Thanks, Tomas 

>       {0x21C2103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21C3103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x21C4103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21C5103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x21C6103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21C7103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21C8103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
> +     {0x21C9103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21CA103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21CB103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
>       {0x21CC103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access},
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to