On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 17:20 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 01/20/2014 05:08 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > It's over a month now. Is anything wrong? > No, I'm busy, that's all.
Thanks for reply. > That said, the current situation is > > a) we need someone to have a look at the performance regression of the > MMC file system layer that you reported. I couldn't find a PXA-based > board yet with a MMC slot soldered on it. But as you apparently have > such hardware, I'd really appreciate your help here. Could you do some > measurements and see whether you see major differences in packet size or > timings? I have the hardware with MMC, but none of the other devices. Could you give some pointer where to start? How would you do measurements? (...) > So please, if you have any spare time, have a look at the MMC > regressions and see if you can contribute anything. I'll hope to find > some time to rebase my patches on top of 3.13 very soon, so we have a > new base to work on. It would be nice to have updated patches. Most interesting is whether the new DMA still works as expected for other devices. Apart from that, would mind if my series is landed with a workaround (Patch v3 7/21). I hope you understand it doesn't feel good to depend on something with no development activity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
