On 01/20/2014 09:51 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:46:41AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> This comment by Christoph was literally the only feedback on this
>>> patchset. The definition of __kernel_[u]long_t is "the size of 'long'
>>> for the native kernel for the ABI". H.J.'s patchset only affects x86
>>> (specifically x86-64) since on all other platforms __kernel_[u]long_t is
>>> simply defined as long/unsigned long.
>>
>> Btw, sorry for the delay in getting back yo your question. How about
>> __abi_long_t or __kabi_long_t instead?
>>
>
> FWIW, in glibc, we use __syscall_ulong_t/__syscall_ulong_t instead of
> __kernel_[u]long_t.
>
Yes, but glibc defines its own headers and doesn't rely on the types
exported from the kernel.
We could rename them all, but that would *definitely* seem like breaking
the universe for no good reason.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
