From: Will Deacon <[email protected]

When contended, architectures may be able to reduce the polling overhead
in ways which aren't expressible using a simple relax() primitive.

This patch allows architectures to hook into the mcs_{lock,unlock}
functions for the contended cases only.

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
index 143fa42..e9a4d74 100644
--- a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -17,6 +17,28 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
        int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
 };
 
+#ifndef arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended
+/*
+ * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that ensures
+ * subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired.
+ */
+#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)                                        
\
+do {                                                                   \
+       while (!(smp_load_acquire(l)))                                  \
+               arch_mutex_cpu_relax();                                 \
+} while (0)
+#endif
+
+#ifndef arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended
+/*
+ * smp_store_release() provides a memory barrier to ensure all
+ * operations in the critical section has been completed before
+ * unlocking.
+ */
+#define arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(l)                              \
+       smp_store_release((l), 1)
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Note: the smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release pair is not
  * sufficient to form a full memory barrier across
@@ -58,13 +80,9 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct 
mcs_spinlock *node)
                return;
        }
        ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
-       /*
-        * Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down.
-        * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that
-        * ensures subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired.
-        */
-       while (!(smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)))
-               arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+
+       /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down. */
+       arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -86,13 +104,9 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct 
mcs_spinlock *node)
                while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
                        arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
        }
-       /*
-        * Pass lock to next waiter.
-        * smp_store_release() provides a memory barrier to ensure
-        * all operations in the critical section has been completed
-        * before unlocking.
-        */
-       smp_store_release(&next->locked, 1);
+
+       /* Pass lock to next waiter. */
+       arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
 }
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */
-- 
1.7.11.7



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to