>>>>> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org> writes:
>> Please remind me why we ignore IP-CSUM guard type again? MKP, will >> this be irrelevant for the initiator as well? if so, I don't see a >> reason to expose this in RDMA verbs. nab> My understanding is that this was used for pre-production nab> prototyping, and is not supported by any real backend storage nab> hardware. We are shipping several products with support for the IP checksum. But it's between application and initiator only. From there on it's all T10 CRC as required by the spec. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
