On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> writes: >> Modular users will always be users of init functionality, but >> users of init functionality are not necessarily always modules. >> >> Hence any functionality like module_init and module_exit would >> be more at home in the module.h file. And module.h should >> explicitly include init.h to make the dependency clear. >> >> We've already done all the legwork needed to ensure that this >> move does not cause any build regressions due to implicit >> header file include assumptions about where module_init lives. >> >> Cc: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> > > Acked-by: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> > > Want to delete the extraneous semicolons, for bonus points? :) > >> +#define module_init(x) __initcall(x);
I would if I could, but as I was discussing on irc with hpa about a week ago, there are ~600 users of module_init who are relying on that extra ";" that we need to fix 1st... :-) [on my todo list!] Thanks for the review; much appreciated, Paul. -- > ... >> +#define module_exit(x) __exitcall(x); > > Cheers, > Rusty. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
