Hi Sachin, On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Prabhakar, > > On 23 January 2014 15:26, Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com> >> >> In the gen_pool_dma_alloc() the dma pointer can be NULL >> and while assigning gen_pool_virt_to_phys(pool, vaddr) to >> dma caused the following crash on da850 evm, >> > [snip] >> >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com> >> --- >> lib/genalloc.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/genalloc.c b/lib/genalloc.c >> index dda3116..f48163f 100644 >> --- a/lib/genalloc.c >> +++ b/lib/genalloc.c >> @@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ void *gen_pool_dma_alloc(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t >> size, dma_addr_t *dma) >> if (!vaddr) >> return NULL; >> >> - *dma = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(pool, vaddr); >> + if (dma) >> + *dma = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(pool, vaddr); > > Wouldn't it be better to return (with error/message) if dma is NULL > rather than silently ignore it? > I am not sure if returning here with error is OK, may be just adding a warning message could be OK ?
Regards, --Prabhakar Lad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
