3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de>

commit 8313b8e57f55b15e5b7f7fc5d1630bbf686a9a97 upstream.

If an array is started degraded, and then the missing device
is found it can be re-added and a minimal bitmap-based recovery
will bring it fully up-to-date.

If the array is read-only a recovery would not be allowed.
But also if the array is read-only and the missing device was
present very recently, then there could be no need for any
recovery at all, so we simply include the device in the read-only
array without any recovery.

However... if the missing device was removed a little longer ago
it could be missing some updates, but if a bitmap is present it will
be conditionally accepted pending a bitmap-based update.  We don't
currently detect this case properly and will include that old
device into the read-only array with no recovery even though it really
needs a recovery.

This patch keeps track of whether a bitmap-based-recovery is really
needed or not in the new Bitmap_sync rdev flag.  If that is set,
then the device will not be added to a read-only array.

Cc: Andrei Warkentin <andr...@vmware.com>
Fixes: d70ed2e4fafdbef0800e73942482bb075c21578b
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/md.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
 drivers/md/md.h |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -1119,6 +1119,7 @@ static int super_90_validate(struct mdde
        rdev->raid_disk = -1;
        clear_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
        clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
+       clear_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
        clear_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags);
 
        if (mddev->raid_disks == 0) {
@@ -1197,6 +1198,8 @@ static int super_90_validate(struct mdde
                 */
                if (ev1 < mddev->bitmap->events_cleared)
                        return 0;
+               if (ev1 < mddev->events)
+                       set_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
        } else {
                if (ev1 < mddev->events)
                        /* just a hot-add of a new device, leave raid_disk at 
-1 */
@@ -1605,6 +1608,7 @@ static int super_1_validate(struct mddev
        rdev->raid_disk = -1;
        clear_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
        clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
+       clear_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
        clear_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags);
 
        if (mddev->raid_disks == 0) {
@@ -1687,6 +1691,8 @@ static int super_1_validate(struct mddev
                 */
                if (ev1 < mddev->bitmap->events_cleared)
                        return 0;
+               if (ev1 < mddev->events)
+                       set_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
        } else {
                if (ev1 < mddev->events)
                        /* just a hot-add of a new device, leave raid_disk at 
-1 */
@@ -2830,6 +2836,7 @@ slot_store(struct md_rdev *rdev, const c
                else
                        rdev->saved_raid_disk = -1;
                clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
+               clear_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
                err = rdev->mddev->pers->
                        hot_add_disk(rdev->mddev, rdev);
                if (err) {
@@ -5773,6 +5780,7 @@ static int add_new_disk(struct mddev * m
                            info->raid_disk < mddev->raid_disks) {
                                rdev->raid_disk = info->raid_disk;
                                set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
+                               clear_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
                        } else
                                rdev->raid_disk = -1;
                } else
@@ -7731,7 +7739,8 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct
                if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
                        continue;
                if (mddev->ro &&
-                   rdev->saved_raid_disk < 0)
+                   ! (rdev->saved_raid_disk >= 0 &&
+                      !test_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags)))
                        continue;
 
                rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
@@ -7812,9 +7821,12 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mdd
                         * As we only add devices that are already in-sync,
                         * we can activate the spares immediately.
                         */
-                       clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
                        remove_and_add_spares(mddev, NULL);
-                       mddev->pers->spare_active(mddev);
+                       /* There is no thread, but we need to call
+                        * ->spare_active and clear saved_raid_disk
+                        */
+                       md_reap_sync_thread(mddev);
+                       clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
                        goto unlock;
                }
 
--- a/drivers/md/md.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md.h
@@ -129,6 +129,9 @@ struct md_rdev {
 enum flag_bits {
        Faulty,                 /* device is known to have a fault */
        In_sync,                /* device is in_sync with rest of array */
+       Bitmap_sync,            /* ..actually, not quite In_sync.  Need a
+                                * bitmap-based recovery to get fully in sync
+                                */
        Unmerged,               /* device is being added to array and should
                                 * be considerred for bvec_merge_fn but not
                                 * yet for actual IO


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to