Network Nut wrote: > I think that the facility by which a thread can block while waiting for any > of several synchronization primitives (*mutex*, *semaphore*, *event*, > *waitable > timer*)...is not only "nice to have", but fundamental to complex (clean) > multi-threaded programming.
You mean a facility like (e)poll, which can wait for things like timerfd, signalfd, or eventfd? Regards, Clemens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
